Typical fit
- Recurring paid requests with clear merchant boundaries.
- Agent hosts that need approvals or budget controls before spend.
- Operators who need receipts and audit context after execution.
Use cases
402flow is strongest when a team wants to keep paid API adoption easy for developers and keep spend, policy, and receipts visible for operators.
Typical fit
Where it fits
These are the workflows where the control-plane story becomes concrete quickly instead of feeling like infrastructure theory.
Put policy and receipts around recurring information purchases instead of embedding payment and approval logic into every research workflow.
Keep the request surface simple while the control plane enforces posture, merchant fit, and spend bounds for internal agent workloads.
Centralize which merchants are allowed, which ones require review, and how denials should surface before a paid call executes.
Treat receipt persistence and audit context as product features, not as whatever happened to be logged by the runtime that paid the merchant.
Two audiences
The developer and operator stories are different, but they should still lead back to the same governed request lifecycle.
For developers
For operators
Next step
The fastest way to evaluate fit is to map one paid agent workflow onto the SDK and the hosted merchant surface, then inspect how policy and receipts change the operating model.